Digital victimization and criminal law: legal responses to harassment, sextortion and contemporary technological violence

Main Article Content

Jefferson Romeo Arcentales-Espinoza
Marcos Vinicio Espinoza-Guillén
Susana Valeria Idrovo-Mosquera

Abstract

The expansion of digital technologies has reshaped intimidation, sexual coercion, and violations of privacy, challenging traditional categories of criminal law. This study examines contemporary criminal law responses to digital harassment, sextortion, and image-based sexual abuse, identifying regulatory, evidentiary, jurisdictional, and victimological limitations documented between 2021 and 2026. Drawing on a qualitative synthesis of twenty preselected studies, the analysis addresses five dimensions: criminalization, consent, electronic evidence, criminal investigation and prosecution, and victim protection. Findings indicate legislative progress alongside persistent difficulties in defining criminal offenses, recognizing the enduring nature of harm, and regulating synthetic sexual images. These challenges intensify when intimate content remains accessible and circulates repeatedly across digital environments without consent. Operational challenges include identifying perpetrators, preserving digital evidence, facilitating cross-border cooperation, and ensuring specialized training for legal practitioners. From a victimological perspective, reporting and punishment do not necessarily end abuse or guarantee comprehensive redress. The study concludes that effective criminal justice responses require integrating legal recognition of harm, investigative capacity, and timely victim protection, while safeguarding procedural rights. It proposes an integrated framework to guide proportionate legal reforms and cautions against equating legislative expansion with empirically demonstrated improvements in institutional responses. Such improvements must be established through rigorous outcome evaluations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Arcentales-Espinoza, J. R., Espinoza-Guillén, M. V., & Idrovo-Mosquera, S. V. (2026). Digital victimization and criminal law: legal responses to harassment, sextortion and contemporary technological violence. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 6(4), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v6/n4/289

References

Andrade-Gonzalez, J. X. (2026). Gobernanza del cibercrimen y admisibilidad de prueba digital transfronteriza. Revista Científica Ciencia y Método, 4(2), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/rcym/v4/n2/194

Barahona-Martinez, G. E., Barzola-Plúas, Y. G., & Peñafiel-Muñoz, L. V. (2024). El derecho a la protección de datos y el avance de las nuevas tecnologías en Ecuador: Implicaciones legales y éticas. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 4(3), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v4/n3/113

Chatzisymeonidis, S., & Pina, A. (2024). Exploring police attitudes on victims’ delayed reporting and victim blame in technology-facilitated IPV. Crime Science, 13, Artículo 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-024-00213-x

Crofts, T. (2025). Intimate image abuse offences: Stakeholder perspectives of the effectiveness of the new offences in Hong Kong. Legal Studies, 45(2), 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2025.4

Edwards, M., & Hollely, N. M. (2023). Online sextortion: Characteristics of offences from a decade of community reporting. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2, Artículo 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100038

Escobar Veas, J. (2026). The criminalisation of non-consensual sharing of intimate material under EU law: Harm matters, privacy doesn’t. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 17(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844261463534

Henry, N., & Beard, G. (2024). Image-based sexual abuse perpetration: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(5), 3981–3998. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241266137

Henry, N., & Umbach, R. (2024). Sextortion: Prevalence and correlates in 10 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 158, Artículo 108298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108298

Henry, N., Gavey, N., & Johnson, K. (2023). Image-based sexual abuse as a means of coercive control: Victim-survivor experiences. Violence Against Women, 29(6–7), 1206–1226. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221114918

Huber, A. R. (2025). Image-based sexual abuse: Legislative and policing responses. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 25(3), 736–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221146141

Huber, A. R., & Ward, Z. (2025). Non-consensual intimate image distribution: Nature, removal, and implications for the Online Safety Act. European Journal of Criminology, 22(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708241255821

Janickyj, M., Blom, N., & Tanczer, L. M. (2026). Online and offline stalking victimisation in the Crime Survey for England and Wales: Its predictors and victim/survivors’ views on criminalisation. The British Journal of Criminology, 66(5), 916–939. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaf064

Kira, B. (2024). When non-consensual intimate deepfakes go viral: The insufficiency of the UK Online Safety Act. Computer Law & Security Review, 54, Artículo 106024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106024

Martellozzo, E., Bleakley, P., Bradbury, P., Frost, S., & Short, E. (2023). Police responses to cyberstalking during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK. The Police Journal, 96(4), 689–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X221113452

McGlynn, C. (2024). Towards a new criminal offence of intimate intrusions. Feminist Legal Studies, 32(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-024-09547-y

McGlynn, C., & Toparlak, R. T. (2025). The ‘new voyeurism’: Criminalizing the creation of ‘deepfake porn’. Journal of Law and Society, 52(2), 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12527

Mitchell, M., Wood, J., O’Neill, T., Wood, M., Pervan, F., Anderson, B., & Arpke-Wales, W. (2025). Technology-facilitated violence: A conceptual review. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 25(2), 649–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221140549

O’Shea, B., Asquith, N. L., & Prichard, J. (2022). Mapping cyber-enabled crime: Understanding police investigations and prosecutions of cyberstalking. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 11(4), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.2096

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Artículo n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Paradiso, M. N., Rollè, L., & Trombetta, T. (2024). Image-based sexual abuse associated factors: A systematic review. Journal of Family Violence, 39, 931–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00557-z

Parlamento Europeo y Consejo de la Unión Europea. (2023). Reglamento (UE) 2023/1543, de 12 de julio de 2023, sobre las órdenes europeas de producción y conservación a efectos de prueba electrónica en procesos penales. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1543/oj

Parlamento Europeo y Consejo de la Unión Europea. (2024). Directiva (UE) 2024/1385, de 14 de mayo de 2024, sobre la lucha contra la violencia contra las mujeres y la violencia doméstica. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1385/oj

Pijlman, V., de Waardt, M., Schoonmade, L., Eichelsheim, V., & Pemberton, A. (2025). The help-seeking behavior of victims of image-based sexual harassment and abuse: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 26(4), 734–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241289435

Polyzoidou, V. (2024). Digital violence against women: Is there a real need for special criminalization? International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 37, 1777–1797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10179-3

Rackley, E., McGlynn, C., Johnson, K., Henry, N., Gavey, N., Flynn, A., & Powell, A. (2021). Seeking justice and redress for victim-survivors of image-based sexual abuse. Feminist Legal Studies, 29(3), 293–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-021-09460-8

Ray, A., & Henry, N. (2025). Sextortion: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 26(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241277271

Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., & PRISMA-S Group. (2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(2), 174–200. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.962

Rigotti, C., & McGlynn, C. (2022). Towards an EU criminal law on violence against women: The ambitions and limitations of the Commission’s proposal to criminalise image-based sexual abuse. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 13(4), 452–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844221140713

Rigotti, C., McGlynn, C., & Benning, F. (2024). Image-based sexual abuse and EU law: A critical analysis. German Law Journal, 25(9), 1472–1493. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2024.49

Ringrose, J., Milne, B., Mishna, F., Regehr, K., & Slane, A. (2022). Young people’s experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence. Women’s Studies International Forum, 93, Artículo 102615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102615

Said, I., & McNealey, R. L. (2023). Nonconsensual distribution of intimate images: Exploring the role of legal attitudes in victimization and perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(7–8), 5430–5451. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221122834

Samaniego-Quiguiri, D. P. (2023). Acceso a la justicia y equidad en el sistema legal ecuatoriano. Revista Científica Zambos, 2(2), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.69484/rcz/v2/n2/45

Sheikh, M. M. R., & Rogers, M. M. (2024). Technology-facilitated sexual violence and abuse in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(2), 1614–1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231191189

Short, E., McNamara, N., Pitchford, M., Conradie, L., Myers, E., Bhaker, S., & Barnes, J. (2026). ‘What I would have liked from the police’: Victims’ experiences of police engagement during the investigation of cyberstalking and cyberharassment. Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice. Publicación anticipada en línea. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166069261435357

Taylor-Dunn, H., & Erol, R. (2023). Improving the ‘victim journey’ when reporting domestic abuse cyberstalking to the police – A pilot project evaluation. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 23(5), 694–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221129436

Wang, F., & Pei, W. (2026). Constructing offender typologies from judicial data: A clustering analysis of sextortion cases. Sexual Abuse, 38(5), 534–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632261434143

Welsh, K. (2025). Changing the law on intimate image abuse: A new paradigm for image-based domestic abuse. The Journal of Criminal Law, 89(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220183251329179

Witt, A., Henry, N., & Beard, G. (2024). Judicial constructions of harm in Australian image-based sexual abuse case law: A feminist discourse analysis. Social & Legal Studies, 33(6), 951–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639241233992